METAPHOR USED AFTER THE 9/11 ATTACK TO JUSTIFY THE KILLING OF OTHER

Authors

  • Siraj Khan Lecturer in English, Kohat University of Science & Technology
  • Arif Khan Arif Khan, Lecturer, Department of English & Applied Linguistics, University of Peshawar

Keywords:

Metaphor, War on Terror, Discourse, Dehumanization

Abstract

This research paper aims at evaluating Dehumanizing Metaphor used in the War on Terror discourse. After the tragic incident of 9/11 the US has been acted with the strategy of the west for the world to be ruled by the spoken words as well as by the whip, the chain or the gun. For this reason I have tried to identify conceptual metaphors used in the War on Terror discourse to dehumanize the enemy. It has been the classification of metaphor that structures our everyday conceptual system, including most abstract concepts, and that lies behind much of everyday language. The discovery of this vast metaphor system has destroyed the traditional literal-figurative distinction, since the term literal, as used in defining the traditional distinction, carries with it all those false assumptions. In cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, or cognitive metaphor, refers to the understanding of one idea, or conceptual domain, in terms of another. An example of this is the understanding of quantity in terms of directionality (e.g. “the price of peace is rising”). Arousing the emotions and dehumanizing others by using metaphors to influence opinions is the central aim of the research. Dehumanizing metaphors in the War on Terror discourse used after the incident of 9/11.Some Internet genres, in particular Weblogs and discussion fora, have a wavering reputation for giving voice to strongly disputatious discourses or strong persuasive speeches. The current research paper investigates the use of dehumanizing metaphors, specifically. It has been explored that linguistic performances of those who is accepted as highly successful political leader in the twenty 1stcentury western society is based on metaphors and very skillfully selected language in metaphors to dehumanize the enemy. The developed discourse after the 9/11 attack has beset the thoughts of every individual on the globe. How conceptual metaphors are developed to dehumanize the enemy.

Author Biographies

Siraj Khan, Lecturer in English, Kohat University of Science & Technology

Lecturer in English, Kohat University of Science & Technology

Arif Khan, Arif Khan, Lecturer, Department of English & Applied Linguistics, University of Peshawar

Arif Khan, Lecturer, Department of English & Applied Linguistics, University of Peshawar

References

Branum, J. & Charteris-Black, J. (2015). The Edward Snowden affair: A corpus study of the British press. Discourse & Communication 9(2): 199-220

Charteris-Black J. (2014) 'Political Style: A Study of David Cameron'. P. Stockwell &S. Whiteley (eds.) The Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 536-55

Charteris-Black J. (2016). 'The 'dull roar' and the 'burning barbed wire pantyhose; Complex metaphor in accounts of chronic pain'. In R. Gibbs (ed.) Mixing Metaphor. Amsterdam: Benjamins, Chapter 8.

Charteris-Black J. (forthcoming) Competition Metaphors & Ideology: Life as a Race. R. Wodak and B. Forchtner (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics.

Charteris-Black, J. (2014) Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan

Charteris-Black, J. (forthcoming) Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority.London: Bloomsbury.

Conrad, Joseph.Heart of Darkness. (1889) New York: Penguin, 1994)

Corn David (2003) The Lies of George W. Bush; Mastering the Politics of Deception.

Distributed via electronic bulletin boards, January, 1991. Reprinted in Brien Hallet (ed.), Engulfed in War: Just War and the Persian Gulf, Honolulu: Matsunaga Institute for Peace, 1991. Also in: Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 1991. Also in: Vietnam Generation Newsletter, vol. 3, no. 2, No vember 1991. Also in: The East Bay Express, February, 1991. An analysis of the metaphorical system used in the public discourse and expert policy deliberations on the Gulf War, together with what the metaphors hid, and a critique of the war based on this analysis.

Grice, Paul 1989. Studies in the Way of Words Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Johnson, Mark. 1981. Philosphical Perspectives on Metaphor Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kovecses, Zoltan. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Springer- Verlag.

Kovecses, Zoltan. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Springer-Verlag.

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George. 1991. Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used To Justify War in the Gulf.

Said, Edward (1993). Culture and Imperialism.

Said, Edward. Orientalism (1978)

The first book outlining the con temporary theory of metaphor.

Turner, Mark 1991. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Turner, Mark. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, and Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

How to Cite

Siraj Khan, & Arif Khan. (2022). METAPHOR USED AFTER THE 9/11 ATTACK TO JUSTIFY THE KILLING OF OTHER. PAKISTAN, 59(2), 154–176. Retrieved from http://pscjournal.pk/index.php/pakistan/article/view/77