SOCIOECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN; THE EQUIVOCAL NAME OF GENDER EXPLOITATION

Authors

  • Samina Yasmeen Associate professor, Department of Pakistan Studies, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad
  • Jamil Ahmed Sheikh Lecturer, Department of Sociology, University of Wah

Keywords:

Gender exploitation, women empowerment, role reversal, labor force, sexual abuse

Abstract

The objective of this present article is to examine overt and covert interpretations of men's power through a feminist perspective. Feminists are more concerned with the individual and collective power that has been given to them in society, and that power is expressed and asserted through interpersonal relations, Biraderi, and organizations. These factors of power serve as referees during an interaction between a male and a woman, such as when males have utilised them as ideological constructions of situations for exploitation and dominance in household activities and in workstation. Previous Studies show that women’s participation in the labor market is at least 22%. Allowing women into the labor market has caused the role reversal. The partner supposed to be taking care of the limits of home, has come out as a bread earner. The existing complications in the relationship patterns are due to this role reversal basically. Female labor force has been working on low salaries, hence the value of manly work has been downgraded to their level. Males are facing shortage of opportunities as those have already been availed by the female labor force. Our paper focuses on the word “exploitation” whether it is by the male family or male oriented society. This “exploitation” has been the bone of contention always. The same situation women have been facing in their homes, which as it was said was “exploitation” but the situations outside the homes are no better. But the question arises if this outside the home “exploitation” is not considered to be the “exploitation” in true sense. Or the women are willing to embrace this kind of manipulation at work place?

References

Ballantine, C., Sabir, M., Ghaus, K. and Duvvury, N (2017). Pakistan: The Economic and Social Impact of Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG), UKAID.

Beall, J. (1996).Participation in the City: where do women fit in? Gender and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 9-16.

Geertz, C. (1973).The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Book

http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SHS/pdf/Culture-Womens-Empowerment.pdf (Retreaved on 04.12.2015)

Ickes, W.& Barnes, R. D. (1978). Boys and girls together-and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mind-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7). 669-683.

LHJ "Intimacy Today" Survey. Pnvate research report to the Ladies' Home Journal

Njogu, K.&Orchardson-Mazrui, E (nd). Gender Inequality and Women's Rights in the Great Lakes: Can Culture Contribute to Women's Empowerment?

Okin, S., (1989). Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

Said,E. W. (1993).Culture and Imperialism.New York: Vintage Books.

Simon, B. L. (1994). The Empowerment Tradition in American Social Work: A History. New York: Columbia University Press.

UNESCO. (1995). A summary review of UNESCO's accomplishments since the Fourth World Conference on Women. Beijing.

Wise, J. B. (2005). Empowerment Practice with Families in Distress. New York: Columbia University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Samina Yasmeen, & Jamil Ahmed Sheikh. (2022). SOCIOECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN; THE EQUIVOCAL NAME OF GENDER EXPLOITATION. PAKISTAN, 60(1), 144–163. Retrieved from http://pscjournal.pk/index.php/pakistan/article/view/87

Issue

Section

Articles