BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE (BRI) AND THE STUDY OF ‘FIELD CHINOLOGY’
Keywords:
Belt and Road, National Culture, Mutual Trust in Culture, Field ChinologyAbstract
Belt and Road (B&R) is the firsts Initiative for the world from China which has brought about economic and social changes in the global culture and society. It is an opportunity to strengthen the ties between China and other countries and enhance cooperation and mutual trust. It needs a professional cultural guide to the implementation of many engineering projects in the BRI. Field Chinology is a discipline concept. It is “a summative improvement on the research results of Chinese folk culture, minority culture and local culture in the past decades of Chinese Ethnology, Anthropology, Folklore, Local History, Archaeology and other disciplines”. Its essence is “to study the culture and its traditions existing in the real life of Chinese people”, and to develop from this special perspective and characteristic method of research. In a word, the study of peoples, societies, cultures and histories around the world with the method and perspective of Field Chinology can also be brought into this field and form the study of world peoples and their social cultures from this perspective and method. Its “down-to-earth” approach to cultural study and fieldwork can feedback the details and patterns of local culture into cooperation and mutual trust among different culture and nationalities/ethnic groups. Only cooperation based on mutual trust in cultures of countries & nationalities can be lasting. This paper argues that with the material realization of the BRI, Field Chinology will provide the World with such wisdom as cultural thinking and methods, cultural details and models, cultural education and cooperation, and cultural knowledge and basis.
References
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. http://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/rcjd/ 958.htm
Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation (full text).http://www. yidaiyilu. gov.cn/xwzx/gnxw/13690.htm
Chawla. Muhammad Iqbal (2017). One Belt One Road Summit 2017 and its Implications for CPEC: An Overview, South Asian Studies, Vol.32, No.2 July-December, p.277-284.
China-Arab States Cooperation Forum.http://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/rcjd/ 60646.htm
Ding Yanyan, Cai Hua.(2015). Cultural Anthropology and the “Belt and Road”. Chinese and Foreign Culture and Literary Theory, (4).p.13-16.
Huang Qichen. (2003). Textual Exegesis on “Silk Road”, Journal of Culture, Vol.48, Autumn
International Cooperation on Production Capacity. http://www.yidaiyilu. gov.cn /zchj/rcjd/2175.htm
New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor. http://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/ zchj/slbk/80076.htm
Richthofen, Ferdinand von (1877). China. Ergebnisse eigener Reisen und darauf gegründeter Studien [China. Findings of My Own Travels and Studies Based Thereon] (in German). vol. 1. Berlin, Germany: Dietrich Reimer. p.496-507.
Tan Biyou. (2013). Thinking on the Construction of “Field Chinology”. Journal of Beijing School of Administration, (2),p.108-113.
The second Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-04/28/content_5386943.htm
Three Responsibilities and Missions of China in “Belt and Road” http://www.xinhuanet.com//world/2015 07/11/c_128009555_2. htm
Tylor, Edward. (1871). Primitive Culture. Vol 1. New York: J.P. Putnam's Son
Zhao Xudong.(2017). Cultural Sharing, Connectivity and Road Expansion. Journal of Study on Central Plains Culture, (5).p.52-60.
Zhuang Kongshao. (2013). Anthropology of “No waste”, Electronic Journal of Beijing Normal University, November 10th, No. 3rd Section. http://bnu.cuepa.cn/show_more.php?tkey=&bkey=&doc_id=886913
Zhuang Kongshao.(2002). General Theory of Anthropology, Taiyuan: Shanxi Education Press.